On 2015-04-24 20:19, Justin B Rye wrote: > (Oops, slightly delayed by a powercut. Hurrah for FS journals.) > > Niels Thykier wrote: >> +<section> >> + <title>Samba4 requires exec-bit to permit files to be open for >> execution</title> >> + <para> > > s/open/opened/, and I don't think people say "exec-bit" (just > "executable bit"). > > <title>Samba4 requires executable bit to permit files to be opened for > execution</title> > > Or maybe it could be shortened to > > <title>New requirements for file execution in Samba</title> > >> + If a client requests for a file to be "opened for execution", then >> + Samba4 will require that the file have the "exec-bit" set on the >> + file in addition to the regular read permissions. This also >> + causes "netlogon" scripts to be silently ignored if they lack this >> + exec-bit. > > If a client requests that a file should be "opened for execution", > Samba4 will require the executable bit to be set on the > file in addition to the regular read permissions. This also > causes "netlogon" scripts to be silently ignored if they lack this > executable bit. >
Thanks, applied as-is. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org