Hi Laszlo, > $ git clone g...@github.com:cc65/cc65.git > > $ cd cc65 > > $ git log --all --format='%aN <%cE>' | sort -u > This is not authoritative. For example someone could sent an email to > Ullrich with his/her patch.
I know for sure that this was in fact done. When Ullrich started with cc65 he used CVS and he was the only one to commit. Only after the switch to SVN there was a group of contributors allowed to commit themselves. > As it was not commited by the contributor > but Ullrich, the person's identity is lost. > At least sometimes Ullich mentioned the name of the author of the patch in the commit log. I'd say only he knows if he did it always. > But well, the commit log can be a good starting point. May you Oliver > handle this? > This seems to be yet another misunderstanding :-( I don't see myself in the driver seat of this overall effort. If I would then the license question would probably be already solved since years ;-) Regards, Oliver
