On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:15:33PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 19, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > apparently http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343671#msg20 > > has the > > solution, works here. I'm not sure either why ignore_device has been removed > Because another Debian maintainer requested it with a good rationale, > so I am not going to revert this change until somebody will explain how > NAME="" breaks lvm and why this would be an udev bug. Maybe someone can strace udev or look at the source and see what the difference between those two settings is?
If people want to use udev at the same time as lvm2/device-mapper they have to configure it to ignore device-mapper devices completely. Its asynchronous design just doesn't fit alongside code that is creating, using and destroying short-lived devices. Alasdair -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
