On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:42:40AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Lun 19 Décembre 2005 22:15, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > > Moreover the current version has some problems that I'd not > > > > > like to see enter testing at all.
> > > > Current testing has an RC security bug. If those issues you > > > > mention are also RC, I suggest you document them in the BTS, > > > > since I didn't find any other RC issues in the tracker. If they > > > > are not, this version should progress in order to fix the RC > > > > security bug in testing that's absent in unstable. > > > you are right on the full line, and I just did an upload of what I > > > should have done way earlier and that was almost ready on my > > > computer. > > > thise one fixes a lot of bugs and use the update that upstream > > > released a few day after I fixed the RC bug in a hurry. > > > -6 is the package that will fix all that should be, and it'll enter > > > etch in 10 days from now. > > If this fixes a release critical security bug, *why* are we treating > > it with urgency=low? > I already did an upload with urgency low, either you can force it to be > high, or I can reupload, as you want. Ok, urgency bumped. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
