On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:38:50AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Sorry but since we are now testing umask variations as well, the new > version is not considered reproducible. The attached patch will fix the > issue.
Oh my FSM. This is the neverending story. I am really considering switching all my packages to dh, but in this case: Is there a reason why a standard, sane umask can't be set by dpkg-buildpackage and be part of what a package may take it for granted? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
