-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:00:11AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >>* Stephen R Marenka [Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:58:48 -0600]: >> >> >>>Sorry, I meant the m68k binaries from 3.4.3-5 built with gcc-4.0. >> >>>I don't know what the implications of that might be, >> >> That if we froze today, or otherwise kdemultimedia did not receive >> more updates, a security update for kdemultimedia would FTBFS. Pretty >> unlikely, sure, but I would have personally preferred that such >> packages had not been uploaded. > > > It seemed preferrable to 4:3.3.2-1, which would be the alternative if > there were no more updates.
Note that I meant it wouldn't make any difference for testing migration of 4:3.4.3-5 as m68k is ignored. So this alternative of 4:3.3.2-1 would only have count on m68k and only would only be valid till the next migration anyway. So I actually didn't see a reason for your upload as I can't imagine many testing m68k users that use kde and can't wait for 3.5 to enter testing (though I could be wrong of course). Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDqDQ85UTeB5t8Mo0RArqaAKC9YJlG30mGmvWpboe+u274nF4izQCfRhSK sgheWyrjGF9bPiLDGLekZdU= =BfkL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----