On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:11:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Oh, I didn't see that. Then you have to call ntohs() on it before > doing any arithmetic operations on it, or interpretting it as an > integer, as in your test.
Yes, that's what bit me. I didn't realize that ntohs rather than ntols (since I thought I was operating on a 32 bit int) was appropriate. In retrospect, it makes sense, but it wasn't obvious to me at the time. Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
