Michael Biebl wrote: > We were reluctant to link against libiptc, since that would mean a > dependency on iptables, which is about 4M of additional disk space which > even minimal systems would have to install. > > Given the recent upstream discussions [1] to switch to nftables, we will > probably wait a bit, until things have settled, before turning this > feature on. Hope that makes sense.
Isn't libnftnl0 bigger than iptables anyway? -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
