On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:19 AM Anders Ingemann <and...@ingemann.de> wrote:

> > Chef is already doing this where the bento boxes are provisionerless
> and the vagrant-omnibus plugin installs the version of Chef to your liking.
> This! Definitely the way to go. Is there anything required of the box for
> that solution to work, or is all you need apt-get?
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:33 AM Chris Fordham <ch...@fordham-nagy.id.au>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 02/06/2015 7:12 AM, "Emmanuel Kasper" <emman...@libera.cc> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The other point is that including (either) provisioner takes us
>> further
>> > > from the standard Debian image.
>> >
>> > BTW, Was is actually a standard Debian image ?
>> > To the best of my knowledge, I would define it as all the packages with
>> > Priority: required and important.
>> > According to the Debian Jessie installation guide [1], the *standard*
>> > task is also recommended.
>> >
>> > In server/containers environments it makes sense to restrict the list
>> > of packages installed.
>> > However the main aim of the Vagrant Virtualbox base boxes,are shareable
>> > development environments.
>> > In this kind of setup, I would expect the usual comfort of the debian
>> > experience, having for instance a mail server to send stuff,
>> > bash-completion or patch installed, all packages with come with the
>> > standard priority.
>> >
>> > So I am in favor of installing this task, which will bring aptitude as a
>> > side effect.
>> >
>> > Concerning the inclusion/removal of providers via specific boxes, why
>> not.
>> >
>> > [1] https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/apbs04.html.en
>> > Section: Package selection
>>
>> Base boxes should be both provisionerless as well as stock as possible.
>>
>> Vagrant plugins should be used to look after installing provisioners such
>> as your an ansible, puppet etc.
>>
>> Chef is already doing this where the bento boxes are provisionerless and
>> the vagrant-omnibus plugin installs the version of Chef to your liking.
>>
>> > --
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cloud-requ...@lists.debian.org
>> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>> > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/556cc9f9.9020...@libera.cc
>> >
>>
>
I apologize for top posting btw. Still getting used to the new google inbox
:-)

Reply via email to