On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 18:47 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 14.06.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: [...] > > Assuming that the intention is to simply rebuild -2 on Jessie, then > > -2~deb8u1 would be more self-explanatory (as an additional changelog > > stanza on top of -2). > > Well, I wasn't planning on adding an additional changelog entry on top > of -2, but rather do this: > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index bb1e475..59fef1b 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -libgee-0.8 (0.16.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium > +libgee-0.8 (0.16.1-1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium > > I just wasn't sure, what the preferred versioning is, in case the > changes in stable and unstable were identical.
Either way round works. -1+deb8u1 as above, as "jessie plus some other changes" (which happen to be equivalent to -2), or -2~deb8u1 as "backport -2 to jessie". In the latter case I'd expect the changelog to have -2~deb8u1 as a simple "rebuild for jessie" entry, followed by the -2 to unstable, in the same way as one would for a backports upload. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
