On 18/06/15 10:38, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Jonathan, hi Michael, > > On Mo 15 Jun 2015 23:36:02 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> Control: tag -1 confirmed >> >> On 2015-06-15 21:37, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 15.06.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>>> Package: release.debian.org >>>> Severity: normal >>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org >>>> Usertags: transition >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> libgtop2 2.30 increased support for the maximum number of CPUs from 32 >>>> to 1024 [1]. This breaks ABI, so requires rebuild of all rdeps. >>>> Fortunately, a binNMU for all rdeps should be sufficient. >>> >>> I just did a rebuild of all rdeps, and all of them built fine. So, >>> unless there is a conflict with another ongoing transition, it should be >>> good to go. >> >> Thanks for checking the rebuilds. Go ahead whenever you're ready. >> > > Will rdeps in experimental also rebuild automatically?
Nothing is rebuilt automatically, but the transition tracker gives us an idea of what needs to be scheduled, and based on that we schedule binNMUs. However, we don't (currently) track experimental during transitions. That's something we should probably fix at some point. > If not, can I request a binNMU for src:marco (in experimental) here? > > What would be the next step to get marco in experimental rebuilt. Either asking here or opening a binNMU bug (which you did, #789135). Anyway, done. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
