Hi again Olly! >But changing to a shared memory object or a different default filename >unilaterally in Debian doesn't seem a good idea, so if you want to fix >this for boinc in the short term, passing an explicit location for the >file is a better plan (as the upstream code already does for OS X). >You'll also have the interoperability considerations, but they are >easier to decide for a single application as the implications of ending >up with two instances are clearer for a particular case than in general.
Really no need to patch wx for Debian :) Upstream is discussing right now to unify the code for OS X and Unix, I'll follow the conclusion they reach, if they reach one :) thanks again, Gianfranco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
