On 07/03/2015 10:27 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > This is the same thing as https://bugs.debian.org/759528 from almost > a year ago, which was fixed in an NMU. The changes from that NMU were not > included ("acknowledged") in the 20150224-1 upload.
Well, that should not happen at all, I agree. > I'm not sure how both the maintainer and the sponsor avoided > this bug while testing the package, given that it should affect any > installation with a dpkg version >= stable? Please try not to re-introduce > RC bugs that were already fixed by an NMU. I was assuming that Bastien knows what he is doing as the maintainer of this rather specialized package. A newbie would usually start with unimportant leaf packages like small games and such, so I didn't really assume Bastien lacked experience. Thus, I solely reviewed the changes he made for the current release and did not perform a test installation as I seriously expect every maintainer to do that with the packages they maintain, again especially when it comes to such specialized packages like autoconf-archive. You may well blame me for not fully testing the package before I uploaded it, yes. But maybe autoconf-archive should be adopted by any of you DDs who is actively relying on the package rather than an apparently unexperienced new maintainer. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
