Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> writes: > On 07/13/2015 11:25 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2015-07-13 19:55 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org>: >>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed >>> >>> transition needed, at least to prevent a ftbfs in openwalnut. >> >> >> We just uploaded 3.3.9 to experimental (goes to NEW queue), and the >> next stable 3.4 should be released soon, maybe it would be easier to >> combine the two in a single transition? >> >> (However, if openwalnut needs changes to adapt to OSG 3.4, it will >> perhaps make things worse). >> >> Alberto is the primary maintainer nowadays and knows more details anyway. > > afaics, openwalnut itself doesn't need changes.
I wouldn't expect 3.4 to be ready before at least a couple of months, if not later. In 3.3.9, we are switching from Qt4 to Qt5, so this is going to break both openwalnut and choreonoid. Even both upstreams support Qt5 currently, their Debian packages seem unmaintained: openwalnut has Qt5 support since 1.4.0-rc2 (but Debian is at 1.4.0-rc1 —no updates in more than a year), and choreonoid package is stalled at 1.1.0 from 2013 while upstream is at least 1.4.0. The point is that there is no easy fix for the current versions of those packages in the Debian archive, so maybe we could let them be dropped until someone steps up again to maintain them uploading newer versions of the packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
