On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:09 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 08:07 -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Ian Campbell <i...@debian.org> [2015-07-22 10:56]: > > > I think you might be right, apart from backports. Maybe in the > > > context > > > of the udeb we should not worry about that though? > > > > I think in the past the gpio_keys file was required, otherwise > > qcontrol wouldn't even start. > > > > I'm not sure if the gpio_keys are optional nowadays, i.e. whether > > qcontrol will still function if the file doesn't exist (apart from > > keys, obviously). > > Yes, they are optional (or that was my intention with that bit of lua > in the cfg file at least!).
Ah, I was thinking backwards about the backports, it doesn't matter what name the kernel provides because everything which makes the device optional would come along with the backported qcontrol. So, I think we should just nuke the check. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
