On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:52:39 +0000 Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote:
> Source: boost1.54
> Version: 1.54.0-2
> Severity: important
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I’ve not yet had time to look at this, but my guess is
> that bjam assumes natural alignment / struct padding,
> which is not portable – implicit alignment assumptions
> should be made explicit, usually by adding padding
> members to structs, if they are to be relied upon.
> 
> Full build log attached.

Can we please have this bug fixed ASAP? I can confirm that Thorsten's
patch solves the bjam issue on m68k, and the g++ ICE should also have
been fixed more than a year ago.

So why did this not have been added so far? *wondering*

And while we are at it, please mind
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793404 . Some parts of
your debian/rules do smell and should be subject to improval.

Regards,
Eduard.

-- 
<ingolfo> Kaum macht mans richtig und schon gehts! ;)
                -- #Debian.DE


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to