One bug per package please and then block this bug on those. Scott K
On July 27, 2015 9:33:12 AM EDT, Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.j.led...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >Package: ftp.debian.org >Severity: normal > >Please remove boost1.54 from unstable. The transition to boost1.55 is >long done, and next boost transition is about to begin. > >Here are outstanding dependencies: > >tophat: tophat [hurd-i386] >- decruft, as tophat is only declared for amd64 kfreebsd-amd64? > >percona-xtradb-cluster-galera-2.x: percona-xtradb-cluster-galera-2.x >[powerpc] >- currently FTBFS on armel/armhf/spacr/powerpc with > -Werror=uninitialized, and -Werrror copilation. >- not in testing >-> please remove the powerpc binary? > > >twinkle: twinkle [amd64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 >mips mipsel powerpc s390x] >- RC buggy, FTBFS everywhere for a long time (multiple issues) >- not in testing >-> please remove all binaries? > >gpsdrive: gpsdrive [amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64 >kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x] >- RC buggy, FTBFS >- not in testing >-> please remove all binaries? > >dvswitch: dvswitch [amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x] >- RC buggy, FTBFS >- not in testing >-> please remove all binaries? > >dc-qt: dc-qt [amd64 armel armhf i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips >mipsel powerpc s390x] >- RC buggy, FTBFS >- not in testing >-> please remove all binaries? > >boost is very well supported across all suites, but I do not wish to >continue any boost support for obsolete versions of boost, held up by a >handful of really under-maintained and buggy leaf packages. > >Is this request sufficient, or should I clone individual requests for >every reverse-dep above? > >Regards, > >Dimitri.
