Guillem could you get a glimspe a this bug? On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> wrote: > On Aug 05, Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And this link should removed a deinstall time and you do not give >> example for migration and check for dpkg-divert ... So your >> description is not complete... Could you give exact script snippet to >> use ? Better could you in parallel create a >> dpkg-maintscript-helper in order to avoid common error ? The > Do you really think that this is needed, considering that I have already > opened bugs with patches for all the affected packages? > (Only zsh uses dpkg-divert, and I do not know how to handle this case.)
Yes I think it is needed, but maybe guillem come with another ideas. Do you have an usertag for tracking bug you have already openned ? For dpkg-divert I do not know how to handle I could be different depending the cases. >> Moreover for library why do we need to create the symlink ? I think >> one library shadow another and is still a bug. In this case you should >> duplicate the tag and create a new tag for library. > I do not understand your comment. I means that binaries under s?bin and libraries are different beast. I think the solution for library is to not use symlink (and delete one of copy) because LD_PATH is always used whereas for bin you could call it directly. Maybe I commit some mistake Bastien > -- > ciao, > Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
