Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this, too comes down to the fact that uml needs some support to > build modules (and perhaps other stuff).
> the most natural and really needed thing is an active maintainer > who creates this infrastructure in a sensible way. not us coming > up with a solution that seems to fit our gusto. > i will start lobbing/searching for a new more active maintainer. I would certainly perfer that, so since you agree with that too, I'm going to hold off on doing anything about this bug for right now. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
