On 8 August 2015 at 14:34, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
| On 8 August 2015 at 13:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
| > However, instead of being properly split out as required by
| > policy, the libraries are shipped as part of the 'jags' binary package,
| > which makes this a bit of a pain.
|
| On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 06:50:44AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I don't see the need for splitting the libraries out of the jags
| > package. What am I missing?
|
| Making it not be "a bit of a pain" in the future.
I hear you "in theory", but "in practice" I know the upstream author very
well, and have a reasonable idea of how this is used (in Bayesian stats
around R in the large sense).
This isn't really a library to link against -- all statistical analysis uses
jags the binary.
But I look into it. The debian/rules is (apart from some overrides) just
%:
dh $@
so I should get by with some simple-enough debian/*.files magic.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
