The whole point of this transition is that the rebuilt library is not compatible. So it can't provide the old name and there can't be a transitional package.
Cheers Julien On August 9, 2015 8:25:46 AM CEST, Eriberto Mota <eribe...@debian.org> wrote: >Hi Julien, > >I applied your patch and I updated some symbols. However, I added a >binary libafflib0 as transitional package to avoid break some >packages. >Is there any problem in doing that? > >I attached a debdiff between afflib-3.7.6-4 and 3.7.6-5. > >Thanks a lot in advance. > >Regards, > >Eriberto > > >2015-08-06 19:14 GMT-03:00 Eriberto <eribe...@eriberto.pro.br>: >> Hi Julien, >> >> Thanks a lot for your quick reply. I will wait 2 days to fix some >> symbols for ports. >> >> Regards, >> >> Eriberto >> >> >> 2015-08-06 18:08 GMT-03:00 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org>: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 22:55:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:44:32 -0300, Eriberto wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hum... Sorry, can you detail for me how to proceed? Need I use >v5? >>>> > >>>> Yes, something like the patch below. >>>> >>> ... except with the .symbols files fixed to refer to libafflib0v5 >>> instead of libafflib0; sorry about that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Julien -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.