On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 13:10:11 -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794489 > > Hi Julien, > > How much do you care about this? I agree the right thing > is for me to bump soname. > > However, I think the easier thing is to binNMU the two affected > packages. Transitions are always a pain in Debian, and my > impression is the overhead is currently even higher with the > GCC stuff. > > Basically if you feel strongly I'll do the soname thing when I find > time. If you don't care that much, I think I'd prefer to take the > shortcut. > I'm happy to get your package removed from stretch if you don't want to maintain it anymore.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
