On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Barak A. Pearlmutter <ba...@pearlmutter.net> wrote: >> Detect mktemp at autoconf time and use two implementation ? > > Runtime detection seems easier and more robust. > How about if I just make the patch Jakub suggested? I really dislike the fact to try something if mktemp fail. We should differentiate mktemp missing and mktemp failling.
Bastien
