On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:16 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed a new libcrypto++ has entered sid, but the transition > tracker[1] doesn't seem to agree on the library names, or something > (it still shows libcrypto++ as "bad"). > > What's going on there? > > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libcrypto++.html
libcrypto9-dbg depends on libcrypto9. Until the transition's at a point where those packages can be decrufted from unstable, the tracker will see a package being built from src:libcrypto++ that depends on libcrypto9, and flag it as bad. Regards, Adam
