On 06/09/15 10:47, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 09:12:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> The short version is, yes the rename is the right thing to do.
>
> I have done this as a non-maintainer upload with the attached debdiff.
> I haven't used the DELAYED queues, because the release team want this
> multi-transition to be over.
My upload was rejected with:
libginac5v5-dbg: lintian output: 'empty-binary-package ', automatically
rejected package.
libginac5v5-dbg: If you have a good reason, you may override this
lintian tag.
so my patch is clearly not 100% right. I'll check more thoroughly and
upload a fixed version later today if nobody else gets there first.
I'd also be happy to sponsor a minimal update for this if you need it
(send a debdiff or a .dsc + .diff.gz to the bug address, or upload the
.dsc + .diff.gz somewhere and tell the bug address where to find it).
S
