On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 23:02:47 +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > Hi Julien, > > I assume the email delivery attempt was made by the regular mailserver > which is responsible for the domain "valiant.palfrader.org"? If I check
No, it's being relayed via the debian.org mail servers. > that shortly by telnetting to the policyd-weight port and provide the > following information within the session, terminated by an empty line: > > request=smtpd_access_policy > protocol_state=RCPT > protocol_name=SMTP > helo_name=anguilla.noreply.org > client_address=86.59.21.37 > reverse_client_name=anguilla.noreply.org > sender=wea...@valiant.palfrader.org > > The result here is: > action=PREPEND X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 > NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_FROM_MX=-3.1 <helo_ips: anguilla.noreply.org > 86.59.21.37 2001:0858:010f:0006:0000:0000:0000:0002>; rate: -6.1 > > So, policyd-weight didn't mark the email with "BOGUS_MX" even if > the domain of the sender address has an a record with a RFC1819 > address. > > Please provide the exact values for the delivery attempt in question. > helo_name=muffat.debian.org sender=wea...@valiant.palfrader.org client_address=206.12.19.146 request=smtpd_access_policy Results in: Sep 13 15:22:01 topinambour postfix/policyd-weight[1916]: weighted check: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 BOGUS_MX=2.1 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .palfrader. - helo: .muffat.debian. - helo-domain: .debian.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=5.41; <client=muffat.debian.org[206.12.19.146]> <helo=muffat.debian.org> <from=wea...@valiant.palfrader.org> <to=jul...@cristau.org>; rate: 2.51 Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
