On Saturday 31 December 2005 20:36, you wrote: > The patches add support for generating extra udeb: lines in shlibs > files. This is controlled by a new argument "--add-udeb" which takes > the name of the udeb package which contains the libs as value.
So far I've kept the patch simple. But some bells and whistles could be
added.
Current patch generates lines mixed: normal - udeb - normal - udeb - ...
I saw in your original mails that might not be optimal.
I guess it would be quite easy to push udeb lines into an array and add
them all together at the end of processing instead.
Current patch always needs the udeb package name with the parameter. It
would however be quite easy to default to ${libname}-udeb.
Let me know if I should implement this or if you've other suggestions.
pgpreGLCGsnFj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
