I have uploaded a new version, which should have addressed all your
previous comments.
Many thanks for your valuable feedback and pieces of advice.
Ghis
On 22/09/15 19:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I can sponsor the package with that lintian warning.
as said before the package should be lintian clean as long as lintian is
correct.
But overriding lintian is wrong, because it is still an issue.
If it is ok for you I would prefer a package with a lintian warning.
cheers,
Gianfranco
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From*:"Ghislain Vaillant" <[email protected]>
*Date*:Tue, 22 Sep, 2015 at 19:33
*Subject*:Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1
On 22/09/15 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation
>
>
> e.g. look at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360
>
>
> G.
>
Should the warning be overridden for the purpose or the review? Apart
from that, I am ready to push a final version.
I have to say that the lucene++ package you quoted really inspired from
a packaging standpoint. Now the ismrmrd packaging feels really clean.
Ghis
