Markus Koschany a écrit le 05/10/2015 13:02 : > Am 05.10.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> Le 05/10/2015 12:18, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I think it's ok to initially build with arch:any as long as there is > sufficient support from upstream. However if it turns out that some > arch-dependent packages are unusable and upstream does not intend to fix > this, we should not claim that we can. I think restricting the build to > supported architectures is sensible then. > > Like I said I don't know if those architectures are supported now. Back > in April Tony wrote that upstream has started to work on architecture > support. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779482#21 > > Perhaps something has changed in the latest version?
Yes, support was added for some architectures. Unfortunately not for ppc64el. BTW building gluegen2 for unsupported architectures leads to bugs like #798652. It is quite misleading for our users to see scilab available on ppc64el while not functional at all. Thanks, _g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
