Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed Hi,
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 19:13 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015, at 18:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > On 2015-10-06 15:32, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > > H-ROOT will change it's IP addresses on 1 December 2015. > > > dns-root-data package holds root zone that's used by some packages to > > > bootstrap DNS root zone data. It might be good idea to update the > > > package and binNMU the r-deps. > > > > That sounds like a good idea, yes. Please provide a debdiff for the > > proposed upload to stable. It'll probably be easier if the binNMUs are a > > separate bug once the package is in p-u. > > I am attaching the full diff as it makes the package in sync with the > current root zone format, but only this part: [...] > -H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 A 128.63.2.53 > -H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 AAAA 2001:500:1::803F:235 > +H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 A 198.97.190.53 > +H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 AAAA 2001:500:1::53 > ; > ; FORMERLY NIC.NORDU.NET > ; > > is the important one. > > I can prepare just the smallest change possible or we can just pull > whatever is in testing/unstable right now. [...] > The full sync is more convenient for me, but I can adjust to what's more > convenient for release team. Looking at the diff, I'd be happy with a 2015052300+h+1~deb8u1 upload as a simple rebuild of the package in unstable; thanks. > > [...] > > > It looks like the same applies for D-ROOT IP address change (2013): > > [...] > > > and J-ROOT IP address change (happened 13 years ago #palmface): > > > > Are those also proposed to be fixed via the dns-root-data upload? > > Unfortunately not (yet), but it's my release goal for stretch to convert > all DNS package to use one authorative source for DNS root zone data. Okay, sounds good. > > If not then please file separate p-u and/or binnmu bugs for any packages > > that > > you're proposing to fix; a general "these things need fixing" bug > > without concrete actions is awkward from a tracking perspective, as is > > mixing multiple actions or packages in a single p-u request. > > This was more a "heads-up" than an action point, so yes, I definitely > plan to follow up with more pus and/or binNMUs. Okay. Regards, Adam