On 9 October 2015 at 16:12, Laurent Gautier wrote: | Building the doc is not that hard (I am building it all the time). The doc to | do it is just patchy. | | The most centralized source of information might be interested here: | https://bitbucket.org/rpy2/rpy2/issues/293/fix-and-do-regression-tests-for-docs | | Otherwise, the dynamic part are beginning to also be checked in version | control, so the doc builds on readthedocs. Building it the same way should be | as easy as "make html" or "make latexpdf" when starting from a clone of the | repos.
I no longer build from the repo [as that process went belly-up for reasons I longer recall; maybe after yet another repository move of yours or some other reason] but just use the source tarball. Would there be another (simple!!) way to build the documentation? As I don't use rpy2 myself, I have somewhat limited motivation in chasing this down. rpy2 2.7.1 is now Debian, a little more delayed than usual as I was out of the country for a bit. Dirk | L. | | P.S.: Enjoy Tokyo. | | | On Thu, Oct 8, 2015, 6:32 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote: | | | On 8 October 2015 at 21:56, Julien Puydt wrote: | | Package: python-rpy2 | | Version: 2.7.0-1 | | Severity: wishlist | | | | Hi, | | | | first, the binary python-rpy2 package suggests python-rpy-docs which | | doesn't exist (python-rpy-doc does, but it's for the previous version!). | | | | Could you please ship a python-rpy2-doc package? | | I have in the past, but Laurent used to either drop documentation, or | require | pieces we don't have, or create other issues for. I was otherwise always a | big fan -- forst project where I saw sphinx in action way back when. | | Laurent, what do I need for 'make doc' these days? | | Greeetings from Tokyo, Dirk | | | | | Thanks, | | | | Snark on #debian-python | | -- | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected] | -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | [email protected]
