On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: src:gcl > Version: 2.6.12-27 > Severity: important > Tags sid stretch > > Hi Camm, > > gcl ftbfs on amd64 and i386 with binutils from experimental. Would you mind > having a look at the build failure? > > OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), Space=0, Speed=3 > Finished compiling /«PKGBUILDDIR»/unixport/../pcl/gcl_pcl_pkg.o. > Loading binary of GCL_PCL_PKG... > Loading /«PKGBUILDDIR»/unixport/../pcl/gcl_pcl_pkg.o > Unrelocated non-local symbol: mcount > > Error: ERROR "The assertion !emsg(\"Unrelocated non-local symbol: > %s\\n\",st1+sym->st_name) on line 236 of sfaslelf.c in function > relocate_symbols failed" > Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging > Signalled by LOAD. > ERROR "The assertion !emsg(\"Unrelocated non-local symbol: > %s\\n\",st1+sym->st_name) on line 236 of sfaslelf.c in function > relocate_symbols failed" > > Broken at LOAD. Type :H for Help. > 1 Return to top level. > make[2]: *** [gcl_pcl_boot.c] Error 255 > > please have a look at these build logs for a reference: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcl/2.6.12-27 > > I haven't looked yet if this is a bad gcl assumption or a binutils > regression (CCed H.J. Lu on the initial report).
Just update gcl source to do something similar to: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-10/msg00190.html https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-10/msg00187.html -- H.J.
