* Paul Muster <p...@muster.net> [2015-11-06 13:50:28 CET]: > On 06.11.2015 13:03, Rhonda D'Vine wrote: > > * Paul Muster <p...@muster.net> [2015-11-04 21:21:39 CET]: > > >> It's especially _necessary_ to split key, cert and chain to different > >> files to be able to use Let's Encrypt certificates. > > This mistakable wording has been clarified >4 hours before your e-mail.
Well, yes and no. Your "clearification" didn't transport much new in that respect: | It's especially _necessary_ to split key, cert and chain to different | files to be able to use Let's Encrypt's certificate renewal machanism. I pointed out that Let's Encrypt's certificate renewal mechanism is free software and can (and should) be allowed to combine the different files. And even if not, wherever you hook in the renewal mechanism (cron script?) it should be fairly easy to add the cat into a single file after it. So reiterating and keep with that it's _necessary_ isn't true in that respect. > > Said that, that doesn't mean I object to ejabberd supporting seperated > > files, but that's something for upstream to handle. > > Fine. Yes, of course, this is an upstream topic. Therefore I asked: > > >> Do you know if upstream already has an issue open for this (I > >> cannot find one)? We are working on filing it upstream and will link it from the bugreport in case it ends up in a public place. Said that, the upstream bug tracker is at github and thus open to all github users to use: https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/issues So long, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los |
