On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 05:30:23 +0200 m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> On Jul 26, Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Do you think that it could be possible to copy 70-uaccess.rules and
> > 71-seat.rules (and maybe 73-seat-late.rules) in the initramfs?
> Adding 70-uaccess.rules is easy, but 71-seat.rules runs some programs
> like loginctl which is not available in the initramfs.
> Maybe we need a simpler rules file just for the initramfs?
> Is this change still needed?
> What do other distributions do about this?
Still would be nice to have yes.
I see two RUN in the 71-seat.rules and the loginctl one is used to lock
the session in case a keylogger is inserted while the machine is booted,
is it a problem if the command fails? The other one is udevadm, isn't
this one already in the initramfs?
Looking at fedora, I see that they are copying the following rules:
inst_rules \
70-uaccess.rules \
71-seat.rules \
73-seat-late.rules \
90-vconsole.rules \
99-systemd.rules
but indeed they are also installing the loginctl apparently (and
systemd-sysctl for 99-systemd.rules).
Cheers,
Laurent
