On November 25, 2015 10:48:45 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > I note that libdcmtk2-dev is again being provided (#805718) so I think > > this bug is no longer serious. > > Although your package won't build against that, because the old > libdcmtk2-dev package is still in the archive, and sbuild will pick that.
I see. But you were the one who filed #805718 "... so that binNMUs can be scheduled without having to wait for every rdep to switch the build dependency from libdcmtk2-dev to libdcmtk-dev". So I'm confused. I would presume if you wanted to file the binNMUs, we could have the old libdcmtk2-dev packages removed from unstable. At any rate, the ITK dependencies will be updated soon. Gert indicated he's only waiting for the newest gdcm upload to be released from NEW. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
