On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:41:13PM -0500, Douglas Calvert wrote: > Why was `-D LLT` added in the first place? The first sentence in the manpage > description is: > > "Override the default when selecting the type of DUID to use."
The goal was to enable RFC compliant DDNS by default. It was suggested
to me to use -I -D LLT.
> Moreover it seems that LLT is used when by default when dhclient is invoked
> without `-S`.
Yes. It's also only something that should affect DHCPv6, at least if I
read the manual correctly. So I wonder why it fails with DHCPv4 in the
first place, and why only for some servers... I'll remove the -D LLT
option in any case.
Andreas, you said you tested running the dhclient command from ifupdown
0.8.1 with only -D LLT removed, and then it worked? So you still used
the -I flag?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
