On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:55:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > To start with, this bug report is mostly a question. I'm not sure if > this is really a bug, and if so, is it warranted against pbuilder.
Yeah, I got a bug, I made a quite important error :\ https://bugs.debian.org/806386 > Currently, the way pbuilder works is that it looks into the > /etc/resolv.conf in its chroot. From it, it determines its name > resolver. > > To keep things simple, for years I ran the dnsmasq caching server locally on > my box. > It helped me to have a static name server, localhost, for that puprose. > > If not using a caching nameserver, how are users supposed to use > pbuilder ? Are they expected to ensure valid name servers are defined ? > I can't see any way to relate the host's nameserver listing into the > chroot. The idea is to use whatever is on the host's /etc/resolv.conf (unless you want something fancy and then maybe you use CONFDIR and whatnot you like to use) I plan to do what I described in comment #10 as soon as I've some time (I was in the reproducible meeting in Athens this week). Do you have something to add or maybe point out something I should take in consideration before that? If you agree that's actually the same bug please merge them. Sorry for the inconvincience and thanks for reaching out! :) -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
