On 6 December 2015 at 17:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: | > On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | >> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev | >> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build dependencies | >> before rebuilding with GSL 2. This affected siril (0.9.1-1) for example, | >> the new upstream release fixes the GSL 2 build failure, but via the | >> libgsl0-dev build dependency the old GSL 1 packages were used to build it. | >> | >> We should probably file bugs for all these packages that otherwise build | >> successfully, because binNMUs don't actually build with GSL 2 as long as | >> the GSL 1.x package are still in unstable too. | > | > libgsl0-dev could be removed... I have asked for that but the ftp team seems to | > be too busy... | | To not be dependent on the removal by the FTP masters, I've filed bugs | for all remaining packages with patches to update their build | dependencies for GSL 2.
You are awesome. Thank you so much. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
