On 17/12/15 14:09, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> writes:
> 
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as
>>>>> discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker
>>>>> package is a blocker for this? Is that because the current pacemaker
>>>>> would be broken by the libdlm update?
>>>>
>>>> No: the new DLM package depends on the new Pacemaker package.  I'm
>>>> already testing them, there's only some cleanup remaining before they
>>>> can be uploaded.  Both will go through NEW though, so it will take some
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> I can speed things up if they block a transition... Got an eta for this?
>>
>> That sounds useful!  I expect to get pacemaker_1.1.13-1 ready for upload
>> today, taking some shortcuts.
> 
> Now the Perl transition is rolling and I can't build Pacemaker anymore,
> because some of its build dependencies are broken.  Is there still a
> reason to hurry the uploads?

Yes, it'd be good to get this fixed ASAP, so that we can rebuild or remove
redhat-cluster.

The perl rdeps should be installable again at some point today, hopefully.

Cheers,
Emilio

Reply via email to