oh, dear upstream maintainer, I just submitted a debian bug to
phantomjs, and I'd welcome a quick word from you in
https://bugs.debian.org/808789 :)

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:36:59PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Reading around the source (expecially src/breakpad.cpp) I'd say
> phantomjs can deal just fine if breakpad is not available there.  With
> this belief I wrote the attached patch, which enables the inclusion of
> breakpad only in those 4 archs (x86_64, i386 and arm in QT_ARCH lingo,
> seems).
> Not that I'm not a Qt guy, so I did the following weird things (it
> works, though!):
>  * used QT_ARCH.  I'm not really sure if this is the right variable to
>    use, I saw also different ones while googling for this issue
>  * couldn't find a nice way to say ((this or this) and (this or this))
>    in the qmake syntax, so I falled back in nesting curly brackets...


what do you say?  (you can see the patch at the above url, attached at
the first message.


-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org                              : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to