Hi dima, Quoting Dima Kogan (2015-12-23 22:30:15) > Oh my. This is an old bug, and I really don't remember much about it anymore. > I do have a buildd setup, but really have no time to look at it now. > > I do remember that I set up the buildd by following the directions, and hit > this problem. The attached patch fixed it. The patch ignores debug-log lines, > which shouldn't look like actual input to buildd. I don't recall what actual > input looks like, but at the time I seemed satisfied that it'll never look > like the logging lines. > > There was probably a bug in something else that made this happen in the first > place, so at worst this patch should be redundant. > > Sorry this wasn't more helpful. I do still have my buildd, and I can look, > but now just isn't a good time. If you want to use my buildd instance to look > at it, just ask.
no worries, there is no rush :) I am just trying to do a big bug cleanup and wanted to see if there is more info you can provide on this bug. Now I'll just see when I have time to look into it myself. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
