On Wednesday 23 December 2015 09:54:05 Marcin Kulisz wrote: > Honestly I'm not sure about it (I mean package name not the change). I don't > really mind to change it to gcs. > I called package *-gs to keep it in the 2 letter convention and to emphasise > that links later are starting with gs://<bucket name>, but if people think > it should be gcs instead I'll change it.
When I read "apt-transport-gs" package name, I wondered what ghostscript (/usr/bin/gs) got to do with apt... IMHO, "-gcs" suffix is better. Hope this helps -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org