On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:45:28PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > I'm following up on bug report 285568 about dput aborting on ftp error. > I think the ugly traceback has been banned, so we need to decide how to > proceed with resolving the bug. > I'm pretty much convinced that the current behaviour of stopping the > upload on error is the right thing to do. > As such, I basically see three options to resolve this bug: > - Have dput print out a note about removing files with dcut when the > error 553 (Action not taken, file name not allowed) occurs, > - Adding an FAQ entry about using dcut when 553 occurs, > - Not doing anything and just close the bug. > > FTP error 553 seems specific enough to put out a warning message (we can > assume our filenames to be innocent enough unless someone fabricates > packages with funny names), so I'm kind of leaning towards just doing that.
I think having dput suggest dcut when this error occurs would be fine. It would be even cooler if it removed it automatically. -- Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
