Hi, Elrond wrote: > > > - The "Depends: zsh" probably should be "zsh:any" > > > > Done, thanks. > > ... because I think, that zsh:any requires zsh to have a > "Multi-Arch: allowed" tag. Otherwise you can't satisfy the > dependency.
Re-reading https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/CrossDependencies#When_shouldn.27t_I_add_M-A:_foreign.3F I'm reluctant to add "Multi-Arch: allowed" to the zsh package. As far as I understand it this would mean that e.g. zsh:armhf would satisfy z-sy-h's zsh:any dependency on an amd64 system where armhf packages are installed for cross-compiling. That seems wrong. OTOH, this would also mean that zsh:i386 would satisfy that dependency on an amd64 system -- which would work, but IMHO is neither helpful nor a real use case. In retroperspective, I think it doesn't make sense at all to make zsh multiarchy in any way, so even that "Multi-Arch: foreign" seems rather useless and overkill to me now. (Re-adding #808977 to Cc again for this discussion.) But then again, I'm not really that multi-arch-savvy. Or does anyone knows a real use case for zsh in a multiarchy environment where any of the multiarchy features is really required? Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE