Hi Antoine, Now that borgbackup is clear to enter and stay in testing again, it may be time to revisit the backport to stable : )
On 01/09/2016 04:57 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > from what i understand, there are two dependencies that need to be > backported: > > * setuptools-scm: backported by Gianfranco already, but out of date > (1.8 backported vs 1.10 in stretch) I don't think that this is a showstopper. According to setup.py[1] borgbackup only requires 1.7 (this is mirrored to d/control Build-Depends), which is satisfied already in jessie-backports. [1]: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/borgbackup.git/tree/setup.py?id=dc168cf8cc7f50870dd1aca8c2329660a7017f4f#n260 > * python3-msgpack: backport missing. zigo contacted, said he would > backport himself. i'll open a bug report about this on msgpack to > track that Is there any news on this? I tested a no-change-rebuild in a jessie-backports pbuilder (seemed to go fine, but I don't know how to correctly verify that), and was able to compile borgbackup with the resulting package. Right now borgbackup-doc built this way has privacy breach (loads javascripts from external url when browsing local doc), which does not happen when building it on sid. Any thoughts? Cheers, - Danny
