Control: unmerge -1 Control: close -1 On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 01:35 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote: > On 21.01.2016 01:16, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: reassign -1 cryptsetup > > Control: forcemerge 783297 -1 > > > > On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 00:56 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote: > > > On 20.01.2016 22:41, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 22:21 +0300, Evgeny Kapun wrote: > > > > > Package: initramfs-tools-core > > > > > Version: 0.121 > > > > > > > > > > If I try to run update-initramfs while busybox is not installed, I > > > > > get an error message: > > > > > > > > > > E: busybox is required but not installed > > > > > E: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/busybox failed with return > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > > This happens irrespective of the BUSYBOX setting in > > > > > /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf. > > > > > > > > You have another package installed (maybe cryptsetup) that requires > > > > busybox to work in the initramfs. > > > > > > > > Try this: > > > > > > > > grep -r BUSYBOX /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d > > > > > > > > Ben. > > > > > > Yes, I have cryptsetup installed, but this problem appeared only > > > after upgrading initramfs-tools to version 0.121. > > > > This change is related to #783297. cryptsetup *requires* busybox in > > the initramfs. If you don't have an encrypted root or /usr then you > > can get away without it. Assuming that's the case, I'm reassigning > > this to cryptsetup as there is an existing request to separate out the > > initramfs support. > > > > Ben. > > Hmm... I have an encrypted root, and it works somehow without busybox.
Well it's not expected to work, so the change to require busybox is intentional and not a bug. It is described in the NEWS for initramfs- tools. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
