Encolpe Degoute @ 2006-01-09 (Monday), 23:06 (+0100) > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=369629&perpage=15&pagenumber=2 > > It's two year old !
What is two years old? Your laptop? The thread? The first post is dated 2005-10-10. > This thread is 2.6.13 related and show another way: > http://www.bitsplitter.net/blog/?p=563 The blog post on that page mentions that the blogger got wpa_supplicant working when using wext. It also mentions that he still has problems getting DHCP replies. From the subject of this bug report I guess that DHCP failure is the problem? Comment number three is the only one mention the DHCP problem, and that post contains the link quoted above. > I found a PCMCIA card today, tested wpa_supplicant with ndiswrapper > and it was working. I doesn't know if is ipw2200 driver or > interaction with it, but I cannot use encryption with this driver > since kernel 2.6.13. Ok. So the problem is that with 2.6.13 it is not possible to use the network, but it is with earlier kernels? > When I reported #340836, maintainer said that 2.6.15 use updated drivers > for ipw2200 and ieee80211. Is this actually the same bug as #340836? Which kernel versions have you tried? Have you tried using 2.6.15? Did you use the included ipw2200 drivers or did you patch the kernel? > I don't know how to debug wpa_supplicant in order to demonstrate that > ipw2200 is the only responsible. The question here is if there is a bug with wpa_supplicant or with the driver itself. -- /Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
