On 02/02/16 08:34, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > > > > On 01/02/2016 15:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >>> >>> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as >>> expected and wanted. >>> The rest, is premature. > >> The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without >> asking for a transition slot and without fixing those problems you mention >> beforehand. It'd have been better to upload it to experimental until > things were >> ready. > Yes. I don't know why the package ended up in unstable, as I was uploading > to 'experimental'.
Your .changes had "Distribution: unstable". Probably because you did "sbuild -d unstable openmpi....dsc". No idea if lintian warns about a mismatching suite in the .changes and the changelog... >> Since that has already happened, it'd be good to know what packages > build fine >> against the new openmpi and which ones don't. > >> Cheers, >> Emilio > I'm rebuilding at the moment. Currently blacs-mpi and adios fail to > compile against > the new openmpi (all other level 1 work fine); this is due to 1.10 not > shipping > libmpi_f77 libmpi_f90 (instead shipping libmpi_mpife) which I'm working > on fixing. OK, I'll binNMU everything but those two in level one. Let me know once you have fixed that problem and I'll do the other two. Cheers, Emilio