On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > It's not how important they seem to *me*, but to the release team. > The FTBFS on non-release archs are not "serious"
I don't see that here: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities btw, will kfreebsd release arch or not - up to the release team, I don't think you can decide about this by yourself. Of course, you can "help" them by ignoring some issues. > > Why you break this so easily? > > (btw, how such archs could get release status if you refuse to assist > > them?). > > This is a breakage that was caused by libtool 2.4.6-0.1 upload. > ... > And as you can see in #814271, I fixed this bug within one week when it > was reported. So please consider your words. Maybe. But to check that - package must be in an installable state on this arch. Otherwise, we can't be sure. Ok, you aren't going to reconsider anything, there is no issue and nothing to do, right?
