-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> It's not clear to me that splitting out the headers is actually a good
>> thing (it's very annoying for autobuilders since the corresponding -dev
>> package won't be installable until the new version has been autobuilt),
>> so I certainly don't think policy should endorse it.
>
> It wouldn't be an endorsement, just a permission. It seems to me that
> policy currently prohibits -headers packages for shared libraries by
> saying that development files must be in the -dev package. Do you feel
> -headers packages _should_ be explicitly prohibited?
If we do anything, IMO it should be to drop static libraries, in which
case in most cases the -dev package could then become arch-all in any
case (most -dev packages only contain a static lib as the
arch-dependent part).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFDxVDgVcFcaSW/uEgRAng1AKCi6aD0w2g+GSqBtGE1jvSolcqh3QCgmd5x
yGrXmbZdJkAQIW21b0CpHXA=
=90u1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
